The ethical dilemma in the ford pinto case

Wednesday, June 18, Ford Pinto: Tooling had an especially short time frame and so the machines that make the car parts were produced before the car was effectively tested. An anonymous Ford engineer commented that "this company is run by salesmen, not engineers; so the priority is styling, not safety. Executive management anticipated the legal repercussions and found it more profitable to fight allegations and legislation rather than improve the safety of their product.

The ethical dilemma in the ford pinto case

Ford Pinto Case Ethical Issues A premier membership is required to view the full essay. The Ford Pinto was completely engulfed in flames and the accident resulted in the death of the three young girls.
The Ford Pinto: ETHICAL PREDICAMENT The Ford Pinto was completely engulfed in flames and the accident resulted in the death of the three young girls. Today, the debate continues regarding whether or not The Ford Motor Company was responsible for this case and many other cases involving the Pinto bursting into flames resulting in disfigurement or death.
You are here The Ford Pinto 4.
The Ford Pinto: ETHICAL PREDICAMENT The Ford Pinto was completely engulfed in flames and the accident resulted in the death of the three young girls. Today, the debate continues regarding whether or not The Ford Motor Company was responsible for this case and many other cases involving the Pinto bursting into flames resulting in disfigurement or death.
Discipline: Mounted in this position, the tank was punctured during tests by projecting bolts when hit from the rear at 20 NIPH.

Wednesday, June 18, Ford Pinto: Tooling had an especially short time frame and so the machines that make the car parts were produced before the car was effectively tested. The fuel tanks of the three other cars had survived only because they'd been shielded from a set of studs that did the puncturing.

An anonymous Ford engineer commented that "this company is run by salesmen, not engineers; so the priority is styling, not safety. Executive management anticipated the legal repercussions and found it more profitable to fight allegations and legislation rather than improve the safety of their product.

Company engineers and other employees as well as shareholders and other profiting stakeholders benefited financially from the executive decision to take the more profitable route; although it could be argued that by not resisting, all knowledgeable stakeholders were equally morally responsible as the one who made the decision.

The ethical dilemma in the ford pinto case

The most important stakeholder in any company is the customer, as they are the blood that runs through the veins and gives life to an idea.

It is the duty of a company to serve their target market, which to some extend Ford did do. Ford built a vehicle that consumers could afford with the utility that they desired; however, their lack of concern for safety endangered the lives of their customers which leads to ethical considerations regarding the value of human life versus the value of company profit.

Analysis Based on Ethical Theories This dilemma could be viewed from various theoretical perspectives in regards to ethics. We see here a clash between two opposing cultural perspectives: That of a corporate culture mindset which prioritizes profit as the highest value, and one of an ethical perspective where it is seen as a social norm to value human life above financial gain.

It is reasonable to assume that the average person would find it immoral to take the life of another human being for financial gain. On one hand, we value human life as a social agreement that we each value our own life and therefore have a duty to respect the lives of others to preserve the right to our own.

On the other hand, we have designed an economic system that incentivizes social progress with personal gain and competition, making our work values different than our personal values. In order to sustain the corporations that provide us with provisions, we embrace the corporate value of maximizing profit, disregarding personal values that contradict many decisions that are made in the name of profit.

Since individually, the people who make decisions that put the lives of others in danger value their own life, they could not will that this be a universal law because they would not want their own life put in danger. Based on our own individual rights and expectations of society, we have a duty to maintain a sense of social responsibility in our personal lives as well as our work lives; even to the extent of resisting when an unethical decision is being executed that endangers the lives of others as seen with the Ford Pinto.

It could also be argued as morally permissible based on an economical argument that shows how more people benefit than the number of people who are harmed. However, if human life is considered invaluable as each of us perceive our own life to be, these types of arguments quickly lose integrity.

To monetize human life for the purpose of a cost-benefits analysis clearly lacks ethical consideration, as life is invaluable and cannot be translated into monetary terms without dehumanizing individuals as nothing more than consumers meant to generate revenue to fuel an economy that is meant to serve society as a means of allowing specialization and trade to improve the quality of life for all.

Ford Pinto Case | Ethics Education Library

Many lives have been lost as a consequence of incentivizing social progress with personal gain rather than social gain. It is true that profit allows the existence of companies that bring forth innovations and luxuries, improving the quality of lives for many; however, if our only concern is profit then we perceive the consumers that fuel the economy as mere cash cows meant to be exploited rather than served.

Ford decides to let the Pinto explode. Fortune, 13 New York University Law Review, Philosophical foundations and business realities. Mother Jones, Retrieved from http:Ford Pinto. the Ethical Dilemma in the Ford Pinto Case On August 10, three young girls died in a Ford Pinto after being stuck from the rear by a driver in a van.

The Ford Pinto was completely engulfed in flames and the accident resulted in the death of the three young girls. In the Pinto case, the Ford Motor corporate heads and engineers were responsible for producing a vehicle known to cause deaths and disfigurements; as was the young driver of the van crashing into the Pinto, causing the deaths of the three young girls.

Others feel they are an example of runaway media coverage blowing a story out of proportion. 5 Regardless of opinion, the Ford Pinto case is a tangled web of many complex legal and ethical issues.

To determine if the proper result was achieved in this case, one has to . The Ethical Dilemma in the Ford Pinto Case. 4 pages words. This is a preview content.

Ford Pinto Case Ethical Issues

A premier membership is required to view the full essay. View Full Essay. The Ethical Dilemma in the Ford Pinto Case. On August 10, three young girls died in a Ford Pinto after being stuck from the.

Case Analysis "Ford pinto" 38, views. Share; Like Agil V Joseph Ignoring thefield reports Neglecting safety issue Obligation to protect theford employeesor the customers Ford waslegal in itsbusiness Ethical Issues Case Study Powerpoint: Ford Pinto And Utilitarianism Peped. The decades since the Pinto case have allowed us to dissect Ford’s decision-making process and apply the latest behavioral ethics theory to it.

We believe that the patterns evident there.

Ford Pinto: An Ethical Analysis | The Business Scholar